Putting an End to the Global Slaughter of Women Bleeding to Death

Midwifery Today, Issue 135, Autumn 2020.
Join Midwifery Today Online Membership

Regular everyday events are rarely newsworthy. The media typically induces emotional reactions through constant reports of deaths related to emerging diseases, accidents, murders, human conflicts, and natural disasters. There is a widespread tendency to ignore the amplitude of chronic problems. Few people realize that bleeding is the single most common cause of maternal deaths worldwide.

These deaths are to a great extent preventable. Most of them will be avoided on the day when we have rediscovered the basic needs of women in labour and of newborn babies.

In the age of “evidence-based medicine” it is becoming strange to refer to daily clinical lessons. However, I find it useful to summarize what I have learned from decades of practice. We need this perspective because the results of the current randomized, controlled trials are of limited use among those who have acquired a good understanding of birth physiology. In these trials, conducted in large conventional departments of obstetrics, the physiological processes are highly disturbed both in the study groups and in the control groups (Prendeville et al. 1988; Rogers et al 1998).

Learning from Clinical Observation

Over the years I have come to the conclusion that postpartum haemorrhages are almost always related to inappropriate interference. Postpartum haemorrhage would be extremely rare if a small number of simple rules were understood and observed. I am so convinced of the importance of these simple rules that I have twice agreed to attend a homebirth, although in each case I knew that the woman’s previous birth had been followed by a manual removal of the placenta and a blood transfusion. I take this opportunity to summarize my own attitude during the third stage of labour, in order to stress the differences between my experience and the “expectant” or so-called “physiological” management used in randomized studies (Odent 1998).

First, it is important to create the conditions for the “fetus ejection reflex,” which is a short series of irresistible contractions without any room for voluntary movements (Odent 1987). This means that the need for privacy and the need to feel secure are met. The possibility of that fetus ejection reflex occurs when there is nobody around but an experienced, motherly, silent, and low-profile midwife sitting in a corner and, for example, knitting (knitting or a similar repetitive task helps the midwife maintain her own level of adrenaline as low as possible) (Odent 2004).

When conditions are physiological, at the very moment of birth most women will have a tendency to be upright (that is probably the effect of a transitory peak of adrenaline) (Odent 1990). They may be on their knees or standing up and leaning on something. After an unmedicated delivery, it only takes a few seconds to hear and see that the baby is in good shape. Then, in most cases, my first preoccupation is to warm the room. In the French hospital where I used to work, we just had to pull a string to switch on a heating lamp. In the case of a planned homebirth, instead of a written list of what to prepare, I focus on the need for a transportable heater (Editor’s note: You can alternatively use a heating pad) that can be plugged in anywhere and at any time (including practical details, such as the need for an extension cord). When the heater is on, it is possible, within a few seconds, to warm up blankets or towels and, if necessary, to cover the mother’s and the baby’s bodies. During the hour following birth, women rarely complain that it is too hot. If the mother is shivering, it is not physiological: it means that the place is not warm enough.

From that time my main concern is that the mother is not distracted at all and does not feel observed. I want to make sure that she feels free to hold her baby, to look into her or his eyes, and to smell her or him. It is easier to avoid disturbances if the light is kept dimmed and the telephone unplugged or turned off. I often invite the baby’s father (or another person who might be around) into another room to explain that this first interaction between mother and baby will never happen again and should not be disturbed. Many men have a tendency to break the sacredness of the atmosphere that ideally follows an undisturbed birth.

During the hour following birth, I remain as silent as possible and keep a low profile. Either I sit down in a corner behind mother and baby, or I disappear, if there is an experienced doula present who has had a personal experience of this situation. Minutes after birth many mothers are no longer comfortable in an upright position. This is most likely the time when the level of adrenaline is decreasing and when the mother feels the contractions associated with the separation of the placenta. Then the birth attendant may have to hold the baby for some seconds, in order for the mother to find a comfortable position—almost always lying down on one side. After that there is no excuse to interfere with the interaction between mother and baby.

For an hour I don’t approach the cord and the placenta. Clamping and cutting the cord before the delivery of the placenta is a dangerous distraction. Suggesting a position to the mother is another unneeded distraction. Her position is the consequence of her level of adrenaline. When the level of adrenaline is low and the mother feels the need to lie down, it would be unkind and unphysiological to suggest an upright position.

Only when an hour has passed after the birth—if the placenta is not yet delivered—do I dare to disturb the mother, in order to check that the placenta is at least separated from the uterus. With the mother on her back, I press the abdominal wall just above the pubic bone with my fingertips: if the cord does not move, it means that the placenta is separated. In practice, the placenta is always either delivered or separated an hour after birth, and bleeding is minimal, if the third stage has not been “managed.” I have never had to inject an uterotonic drug to control bleeding.

Such an attitude, based first on clinical observation, must be associated with physiological considerations. An easy delivery of the placenta, with moderate blood loss, implies that, immediately after the birth of the baby, a surge of oxytocin has been released. It is well-known that oxytocin release is highly dependent on environmental factors. It can be inhibited by adrenaline. This is more than empirical knowledge. A team from Sapporo (Japan) has studied the levels of adrenaline during the different phases of labour extensively by a non-invasive method (recording with a patch and analyzing the skin micro vibration pattern of the palmar side of the hand) (Saito, Sano, and Satohisa 1991) and confirmed the findings of a previous study in which adrenaline levels were measured through indwelling catheters (Lederman et al. 1978). The Japanese team clearly demonstrated that postpartum haemorrhages are associated with high levels of adrenaline. The release of oxytocin can also be inhibited by the activity of the neocortex. After a birth under physiological conditions, the mother is still in a special state of consciousness, as if “on another planet.” Her neocortex is still more or less at rest. The advice is: “Don’t wake up the mother!” (Odent 2002). It is another opportunity to refer to privacy and silence.

Major Obstacles

I had the opportunity to explain these simple rules to intelligent teen-agers who were free from pre-conceived ideas. They could easily understand the conflict between adrenaline (the emergency hormone released when we are cold or scared) and oxytocin (the hormone necessary to contract the uterus). They also could easily understand that when a mother is discovering her baby, she may have a tendency to forget the rest of the world: this is the wrong time to distract her.

While these simple rules are considered indisputable among the exceptionally rare mothers who have experienced an undisturbed third stage of labour, among birth attendants who have not been trained to “manage,” and among those who think like physiologists, we must wonder why they are universally ignored. In other words, we must wonder why all known societies disturb the physiological processes in the period surrounding birth.

Interference comes via birth attendants who are more often than not active, even invasive. Originally women probably gave birth close to their mother, or close to another experienced mother in the family or in the community. This is the root of midwifery. A midwife is fundamentally a mother figure. In an ideal world, our mother is the prototype of the person with whom one feels secure without feeling observed or judged. In many societies the birth attendant also became a guide and a helper.

The transmission of beliefs and rituals is the most powerful way to control the birth process, particularly the phase of labour between the birth of the baby and the delivery of the placenta. Let us first mention, as an example, the cross-cultural belief that colostrum is tainted or harmful—even a substance to be expressed and discarded. This negative misunderstanding of colostrum implies that, immediately after being born, the baby must be in the arms of a person other than the mother. This is the origin of a widespread, deep-rooted ritual, which is to rush to cut the cord. Space here does not permit a comprehensive list of all known rituals and beliefs that disturb the physiological processes. Likewise, we cannot mention all the beliefs that reinforce the common repulsion toward colostrum. But, as an example, there is a belief shared by several West African ethnic groups that, on the first day, the mother should not look at the newborn’s eyes, so that “the bad spirits cannot enter the baby’s body.” In the Dagara tribe in Burkina Faso, according to Sobonfu Somé, the “keeper of the rituals,” when a woman is in labour, the young children of the community wait nearby. As soon as they hear the first cry, they all rush to the place of birth shouting to welcome the baby (Somé 1999). What a powerful way to inhibit the release of oxytocin and to create the conditions for a difficult and bloody delivery of the placenta!

We must realize that the twenty-first century cultural milieu is transmitting its own beliefs, particularly via the natural childbirth movements. These beliefs are also often at odds with what we can learn from physiological perspectives. Let us just consider the vocabulary commonly used that gives an active role to the birth attendant: coaching, guiding, helping, supporting, etc.

In order to evaluate the evolutionary advantages of this multitude of beliefs and rituals, we must keep in mind that the basic strategy for survival of most human groups is to dominate nature and other human groups; it is, therefore, an advantage to make human beings more aggressive and destructive. By the same token, it is an advantage to moderate the capacity to love, including love of nature, that is to say the respect for Mother Earth. This explains the evolutionary advantages of disturbing the physiological processes in the period surrounding birth, particularly the third stage of labour, which is now considered critical in the development of the capacity to love. Over the millennia there has been a selection of human groups according to their potential for aggression. We are all the fruit of such a selection.

These considerations must be explored within the context of the twenty-first century (Odent 1990). We are at a time when humanity must invent radically new strategies for survival.

Today we are in the process of realising the limits of traditional strategies. We must raise new questions such as: “How do we develop a form of love that respects Mother Earth?” In order to stop destroying the planet we need a unification of the planetary village. We need more than ever the energies of love. All the beliefs and rituals that challenge the maternal protective and aggressive instincts are losing their former evolutionary advantages. We have new reasons to respect physiological processes as much as possible. We have a new impetus to rediscover the basic needs of labouring women and newborn babies. The first immediate reason is, of course, to put an end to the global slaughter of women.

Enormous Disparities

While postpartum haemorrhage is a common complication on all five continents, there is an enormous disparity regarding the burden of maternal death. This disparity is impressive when considering the maternal mortality ratios in 170 countries, as they were displayed in a table published in the Human Development Report in 1995. These ratios express the number of deaths from pregnancy-related causes per 100,000 live births. They can be as high as 2300 (Rwanda) and as low as 6 (Australia, Canada, Finland). The worldwide ratio is in the region of 400 (Hill, AbouZahr, and Wardlaw 2001). It is around 10 in wealthy countries.

It is striking that more than half the maternal deaths occur in Africa (AbouZahr 2003). Among the 23 countries with a ratio above 1000 per 100,000, 22 are African (the other one is Haiti). This intriguing fact needs to be interpreted (and we must acknowledge that malaria increases the risk of maternal death) (Hammerich, Campbell, and Chandramohan 2002). The first and obvious explanation is that most African countries have a very low standard of living. This implies that all health criteria are low and that most haemorrhages are not effectively treated in well-equipped and well-organized hospitals. However, certain African countries have a high maternal death ratio compared with their gross income per capita. For example, the maternal mortality ratio of 1400 in Equatorial Guinea is high compared with the gross income per capita ($5640). In Bulgaria, for example, where the gross income per capita is also below $6000, the maternal mortality ratio is 23, according to the same source.

I suggest an additional reason why it is so common to bleed after giving birth in Africa and why so many African young mothers die. It is precisely on that continent that the most powerful and invasive perinatal beliefs and rituals exist and are transmitted from generation to generation. India, where childbirth is also highly ritualised, has a maternal mortality ratio estimated at 560 per 100 000 live births and postpartum haemorrhage accounts for 35–56% of these deaths (Kodkany et al. 2004). Postpartum haemorrhage is, to a certain extent, a complication of the socialisation of childbirth.

Meanwhile

After thousands of years of culturally controlled childbirth, it would not be realistic to try to reduce overnight the rates of maternal death simply by promoting privacy and undisturbed first contact between mother and newborn baby in a warm place. Would this be acceptable, since it would shake the very foundations of our civilisations? We have come to rely on pharmacological agents.

In September 2003, at its triennial meeting in Santiago, Chile, the International Confederation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (FIGO) recommended active management during the third stage of labour, with uterotonic drugs, cord traction, and fundal massage as the optimum ways to reduce postpartum haemorrhage. The International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) established similar protocols at its conference in Trinidad. In wealthy countries, synthetic oxytocin is the most commonly used uterotonic agent. It is given via injection, either in isolation (Pitocin, Syntocinon) or associated with ergometrine (Syntometrin).

For many reasons, synthetic oxytocin cannot be widely used in those parts of the world where the largest number of deaths from postpartum haemorrhage occur (due to cost, administration by injection, thermolability, and so on). This is why misoprostol is appropriate. It is an E1 prostaglandin analogue that stimulates uterine contractions, rapidly and powerfully. It has an excellent safety profile, is heat-stable, low-cost, and has been identified as an important technology for reducing maternal mortality in homebirth.

All over the world, active management of the third stage is now the recommended protocol. It is undoubtedly the best way to reduce the global burden of maternal death in the near future. From a long-term perspective, we must wonder what the effects will be on the evolution of our civilizations of routinely replacing by drugs the main natural “hormone of love,” at a critical time for mother-child attachment.

While it takes only a few minutes to learn how to use synthetic oxytocin or misoprostol, it will take decades to understand the meaning of privacy.

References:

  • AbouZahr C. 2003. “Global burden of maternal death and disability.” Br Med Bull 67: 1–11.
  • Hammerich, A, OM Campbell, and D Chandramohan. 2002. “Unstable malaria transmission and maternal mortality—experiences from Rwanda.” Trop Med Int Health 7(7): 573–76.
  • Hill, K, C AbouZahr, and T Wardlaw. 2001. “Estimates of maternal mortality for 1995.” Bull World Health Organ 79(3): 182–93.
  • Kodkany, BS, et al. 2004. “Initiating a novel therapy in preventing postpartum haemorrhage in rural India: a joint collabouration between the United States and India.” Int J Fertil Womens Med 49(2): 91–96.
  • Lederman, RP, et al. 1978. “The relationship of maternal anxiety, plasma catecholamines and plasma cortisol to progress in progress in labour.” Am J Obstet Gynecol 132(5): 495–500.
  • Odent, M. 1987. “The Fetus Ejection Reflex.” Birth 14: 104–05.
  • —— 1990. “Position in delivery.” Lancet 335(8698): 1166.
  • —— 1998. “Don’t manage the third stage of labour!” Pract Midwife 1(9): 31–33.
  • —— 1999. The Scientification of Love. London: Free Association Books.
  • —— 2002. “The first hour following birth. Don’t wake the mother!” Midwifery Today 61: 9–12.
  • ——. 2004. “Knitting midwives for drugless childbirth.” Midwifery Today 71: 21–22.
  • Prendeville, WJ, et al. 1988. “The Bristol third stage trial: active versus physiological management of the third stage of labour.” BMJ 297(6659): 1295–300.
  • Rogers, J, et al. 1998. “Active versus expectant management of third stage of labour: the Hinchingbrooke randomised controlled trial.” Lancet 351(9104): 693–99.
  • Saito, M, T Sano, and E Satohisa. 1991. “Plasma catecholamines and microvibration as labour progresses.” Shinshin-Thaku 31: 381–89. (Also presented at the Ninth International Congress of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Amsterdam 28-1 May 1989 (Free communication no. 502).
  • Somé, Sobonfu. 1999. Welcoming Spirit Home: Ancient African Teachings to Celebrate
  • Children and Community. Novato, California: New World Library.

About Author: Michel Odent

Michel Odent Michel Odent, MD, has been in charge of the surgical unit and the maternity unit at the Pithiviers (France) state hospital (1962–1985) and is the founder of the Primal Health Research Centre (London). He is the author of the first articles in the medical literature about the initiation of lactation during the hour following birth and of the first article about use of birthing pools (The Lancet 1983). He created the Primal Health Research database. He is the author of 15 books published in 22 languages. His 2015 book, titled Do We Need Midwives?, is followed by an addendum titled Will Humanity Survive Medicine? Co-author of five academic books, he is also a contributing editor to Midwifery Today magazine.

His approach has been featured in eminent medical journals such as The Lancet and in TV documentaries such as the BBC film Birth Reborn. After his hospital career he practiced homebirths. As a researcher Michel Odent founded the Primal Health Research Center in London, England, which focuses on the long-term consequences of early experiences. An overview of the Primal Health Research data bank www.primalhealthresearch.com demonstrates how health is shaped during the primal period (from conception until the first birthday). The research also suggests that the way we are born has long-term consequences for sociability, aggressiveness—in other words, for our capacity to love. Michel Odent has developed a pre-conception program (the “accordion method”) that minimizes the polluting effects of synthetic fat-soluble chemicals, such as dioxins and PCBs, during pregnancy and breastfeeding. His other research interests are the nonspecific long-term effects of early multiple vaccinations. Visit Michel Odent’s website at www.wombecology.com/. For further information on Michel Odent, his books and the Primal Health Research Center, visit www.primalhealthresearch.com. Learn about the Paramana Doula Course by Michel Odent and Liliana Lammers, an experienced doula, at www.paramanadoula.com. To view Michel Odent’s responses to questions on the Mothering magazine site, see www.mothering.com/sections/experts/odent-archive.html In addition to approximately 50 scientific papers, Odent has published 15 books in 23 languages. His books demonstrate his artistry in turning traditional questions around: “How do we develop good health?” instead of “How do we prevent disease?” or “How do we develop the capacity to love?” instead of “How do we prevent violence?” Michel Odent is the author of the first article in the medical literature about the use of birthing pools (The Lancet 1983), of the first article about the initiation of lactation during the hour following birth, and of the first article applying the “Gate Control Theory of Pain” to obstetrics. He is the author of 12 books published in 22 languages. After his hospital career he practiced homebirths. Odent’s 21st-century books (The Scientification of Love, The Farmer and the Obstetrician and The Caesarean) may be regarded as a trilogy. They raise urgent questions about the future of our civilizations. Other books by Michel Odent:

Photo by Serge A McCabe

View all posts by

Midwifery Today
  Skip to content